Dining Across the Divide: Perspectives on Immigration and Culture
Meeting the Individuals
Stephen, sixty-four, Canvey Island
Occupation: Former insurance professional
Political history: Usually Conservative, apart from when he lived in “the socialist republic of south Hackney” and voted for the Social Democratic Party
Interesting fact: His specialty in underwriting was kidnap and ransom: “Everyone always says that insurance is dull, but it’s not when you’re discussing evacuating people from South Korea because the North Koreans have opened the missile silos”
Eva, 25, London
Occupation: Graduate in psychology
Voting record: In her home country, New Zealand, she supported both progressive parties
Interesting fact: Eva has worked as a singer on ocean liners; her most extended voyage was six months, which is a long time to be on a boat
For starters
Eva: Steve seemed there to have a nice time, to be open
Steve: She seemed like a very intelligent, articulate, nice person
She: I had a caprese salad, mushroom pasta, and a creamy dessert thing, it was very good
The big beef
She: He was definitely on the side of immigration being reduced. He thinks that British people who already live here, including non-white white British, face limited access to the essential services, because more and more people are entering. Whereas I just don’t think the figures are so problematic
He: I’m for skilled immigration, I have no desire to reside in a homogeneous, WASP country with tepid ale. But I believe that authorities have exploited immigration to fill the jobs they struggle to staff without raising wages. Pay are suppressed, so taxes have to be minimized, so we can’t do things better – spend more money on child support, on education, on technology
She: I don’t have that much knowledge of Brexit, because I was 16 and not living here when it happened. He clarified it to me in a different perspective. He informed me about “posted workers” – candidates could come here and receive solely the salary of the country they came from
He: Macron spent two years getting the EU to abolish the system; it was revised in 2018. Before that, migrant laborers coming in were undercutting British workers. Under Gordon Brown, it was petroleum staff that were imported; later it’s been service industry, farms. She understood that, because she’d worked on a passenger vessel and said she was paid a lot more than international colleagues
Common ground
Steve: It would be ideal to have a alternative power, come off of oil. I disapprove of environmental harm, I love the clean air, I love the countryside. We found consensus on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of the Scandinavian nation?” Their energy revenues skyrocketed after the conflict began, they allocated those funds to build eco-friendly systems
She: So we’re using their oil. You can see that’s an unfavorable approach to go about things. He was supportive of maintaining domestic drilling for the limited quantity we’ll need in the future. I partially concur with him. We’re still going to use planes. We both think we should be moving towards greener solutions, windfarms and water power
For afters
She: We briefly discussed anti-Muslim sentiment, though we didn’t call it that. He seemed worried by extremism coming here – he did mention that a lot of the people in the Arab world were radical, which I didn’t think accurate. I think it’s discriminatory to make judgments based on faith
He: I hail from the East End. I asked her if she’d been to that district, and she said it had been gentrified. Naturally, I would say that: full of yuppies. But when I go down Chrisp Street market, I look like a foreigner. People gaze at me because it’s become predominantly Islamic. She gave a slight glance at me about that. I used the word segregated area. Eva’s got Eastern European roots – she doesn’t like that word, to her it denotes deprivation. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes their own.” I agreed to use a alternative term – maybe community?
She: I believe that Muslim people are really disproportionately shown in the media as engaging in misconduct. It seems a little bit discriminatory, or prejudiced against foreigners
Conclusion
He: I think we separated amicably. We had a embrace at the train stop
She: We both said that we’d had a lovely time